Best Discord Anti-Raid Bots 2026

Short answer

There are two established and proven names in the anti-raid vertical: Wick and Security. If you are looking for a zero-setup solution solely against mass bot raids, Beemo is enough. But before any of that, the first step is completely free: enabling Discord's own Raid Protection and AutoMod settings.

Let's be clear: this list is written by the VeyroBot team, and VeyroBot is included in it. We didn't put ourselves in first place; the ranking is based on the criteria below, and VeyroBot ranks last on those criteria.

This topic in VeyroBot:Discord Anti-Raid Bot →

How the ranking was made

Most lists in this space are created by bots self-declaring as number one on their own marketing pages. To avoid doing this, we chose a single metric: how many servers it protects and how long it has been in the field.

The reason is simple. Anti-raid is the feature with the lowest error tolerance. A false positive bans real members; a false negative loses you the server. Distinguishing between these two errors is only possible for a system that has seen a vast number of real raids. A new bot might be well-designed, but it lacks the same data.

All server counts are provided with their sources and dates. We did not write down any figure we could not verify.

Comparison

Tool	Servers (source)	Primary job	Weakness
Discord Raid Protection	Built-in	Join surge and verification gate	No setting depth
Security	1.48M (top.gg, Sep 12, 2026)	Score-based join evaluation, anti-nuke	Takes a long time to set up
Wick	1,000,349 (top.gg, Sep 12, 2026)	Anti-nuke, threshold-based permission stripping, state restoration	Requests broad permissions, older panel
Beemo	100,000+ (beemo.gg, Sep 12, 2026)	Detecting mass bot influx and mass banning	Single-purpose, no dashboard
Vetox	9,930 (top.gg, Sep 12, 2026)	Audit log monitoring and automated punishment	New, low field data
VeyroBot	10 (Discord Developer Portal, Sep 12, 2026)	Threshold-based lockdown and permission rollback	Smallest on the list

1. Discord's own Raid Protection and AutoMod

This is what you should do before adding any bot. The verification level in Server Settings, the explicit content filter, and Discord's built-in AutoMod rules are free, require no permissions granted to any bot, and have zero latency since they run on Discord's own infrastructure.

Their limit is also clear: you cannot fine-tune the thresholds, and they lack features like mass-locking channels during a raid and then restoring them to their previous permissions. This is precisely where the need for a bot begins.

2. Security

Reports 1.48 million servers on top.gg (Sep 12, 2026). It evaluates joining accounts not on a single rule, but on a combination of signals such as account age and profile features. On the anti-nuke side, it monitors numerous destructive actions individually.

Its distinctive feature is its own permission system, allowing moderators to take action without having full administrator rights in Discord. In return, its setup is one of the longest on this list.

3. Wick

Reports 1,000,349 servers on top.gg (Sep 12, 2026). It is considered the benchmark in the anti-nuke space: it defines thresholds for actions such as channels deleted, bans issued, or roles distributed per minute, and automatically strips permissions—including from administrators—of any account exceeding that threshold.

If destruction occurs, it can restore channels from a snapshot. The price for this is requesting a very broad set of permissions; this is a trust decision that not every server is comfortable making.

4. Beemo

States on its website that it is used in over 100,000 servers (Sep 12, 2026). It does one thing: detects mass fake account influxes and mass bans them. No settings, no dashboard, no command set.

This simplicity is both its strength and its limit. Do not expect verification, auto-moderation, or logging; it is added as a layer alongside another bot.

5. Vetox

Reports 9,930 servers on top.gg (Sep 12, 2026). It belongs to the new generation and focuses on audit logs: it monitors dangerous action types, automatically penalizes the account performing the action, and evaluates join velocity combined with an account age filter. It offers a multilingual interface.

Since it is relatively new in the field, it makes sense to test it before making it the sole security layer on a large server.

6. VeyroBot

The smallest on this list: installation count on the Discord Developer Portal was 10 servers on September 12, 2026. It has no field experience to compare with the scale of the bots above, and there is no point in hiding that.

Let's write down what it concretely does, and the decision is yours. If the number of joins in the last 10 seconds exceeds the threshold set by the server (default 10), it locks text channels holding permission objects. Before locking, it writes the @everyone status of each channel—allowed, denied, or neutral—to the database. The /unlock command reverts all recorded channels to their previous state, not neutral. Since the record is kept in the database rather than in memory, the rollback works even if the bot restarts.

It also applies the punishment chosen by the server to accounts newer than a specified day; if the day value is zero, this check is disabled. Aside from anti-raid, it generates a health report scoring the server's security settings—its real value lies here, as it shows dangerous permissions left open before a raid happens. Details: Anti-Raid page, for scope check the Premium page.

Who it is for, who it is not for

Wick or Security: Servers with tens of thousands of members, targeted, and where the risk of an admin account compromise is real.

Beemo: Servers experiencing solely bot raid issues and wanting zero configuration hassle.

VeyroBot: Servers looking for a multi-module bot already managed from a single dashboard and wanting anti-raid as part of that setup.

Not suitable: If you are exclusively looking for an anti-raid bot and your server is large, VeyroBot is not the right choice; choose one of the bots above that has been doing this job for years.

Frequently asked questions

Should I install multiple anti-raid bots?

Generally no. If two bots independently penalize the same join, you get double bans and messy logs. The common exception is adding the single-purpose Beemo alongside a general-purpose bot.

Does an anti-raid bot require Administrator permission?

Most do not, but they need Manage Channels for channel locking, and Ban Members or Kick Members permissions for punishment. Those with anti-nuke features require broader permissions because they need to strip permissions from an authorized account.

What happens if there is a false positive?

Real members get banned. Therefore, adjust thresholds according to your server's normal join velocity, and keep punishments on a milder option rather than a ban during the first week while monitoring logs.

Do locked channels return to their former state afterwards?

Depends on the bot. Some bots pull permissions to neutral, which deletes permissions specifically defined before the lock. Choose a solution that records the pre-lock state.

What should I do before a raid happens?

Raise the verification level, close dangerous permissions in the @everyone role, and define a moderation log channel. Most raids feed on an already left-open permission.

Last updated: September 13, 2026. Server counts are values reported by the bots themselves and published on listing pages; each is provided above with its source and date. This article was written by the VeyroBot team, and VeyroBot is included in the list.